2015-02-17: Reactions To Vint Cerf's "Digital Vellum"
Don't you just love reading BuzzFeed-like articles, constructed solely of content embedded from external sources? Yeah, me neither. But I'm going to pull one together anyway.
Vint Cerf generated a lot of buzz last week when at an AAAS meeting he gave talk titled "Digital Vellum". The AAAS version, to the best of my knowledge, is not online but this version of "Digital Vellum" at CMU-SV from earlier the same week is probably the same.
The media (e.g., The Guardian, The Atlantic, BBC) picked up on it, because when Vint Cerf speaks people rightly pay attention. However, the reaction from archiving practitioners and researchers was akin to having your favorite uncle forget your birthday, mostly because Cerf's talk seemed to ignore the last 20 or so years of work in preservation. For a thoughtful discussion of Cerf's talk, I recommend David Rosenthal's blog post. But let's get to the BuzzFeed part...
In the wake of the media coverage, I found myself retweeting many of my favorite wry responses starting with Ian Milligan's observation:
Andy Jackson went a lot further, using his web archive (!) to find out how long we've been talking about "digital dark ages":
And another one showing how long The Guardian has been talking about it:
And then Andy went on a tear with pointers to projects (mostly defunct) with similar aims as "Digital Vellum":
So maybe Vint didn't forget our birthday, but we didn't get a pony either. Instead we got a dime kitty.
--Michael
Vint Cerf generated a lot of buzz last week when at an AAAS meeting he gave talk titled "Digital Vellum". The AAAS version, to the best of my knowledge, is not online but this version of "Digital Vellum" at CMU-SV from earlier the same week is probably the same.
The media (e.g., The Guardian, The Atlantic, BBC) picked up on it, because when Vint Cerf speaks people rightly pay attention. However, the reaction from archiving practitioners and researchers was akin to having your favorite uncle forget your birthday, mostly because Cerf's talk seemed to ignore the last 20 or so years of work in preservation. For a thoughtful discussion of Cerf's talk, I recommend David Rosenthal's blog post. But let's get to the BuzzFeed part...
In the wake of the media coverage, I found myself retweeting many of my favorite wry responses starting with Ian Milligan's observation:
This article on the "digital dark age" could have been written in 1996... kinda ignores whole fields of work. http://t.co/5Lg2j5SmV0
— Ian Milligan (@ianmilligan1) February 13, 2015
Andy Jackson went a lot further, using his web archive (!) to find out how long we've been talking about "digital dark ages":
"Digital Dark Age", eh? Seems familar... http://t.co/AKwd9YedEw e.g. http://t.co/A3JYjWEUf8, http://t.co/RBf4W2pA1N pic.twitter.com/z4nlkncXqu
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 13, 2015
And another one showing how long The Guardian has been talking about it:
The Digital Dark Age ... Still Looming After All These Years: 2003 (http://t.co/RBf4W2pA1N) to 2015 (http://t.co/S0ykcGZZTf) (typo fixed)
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
And then Andy went on a tear with pointers to projects (mostly defunct) with similar aims as "Digital Vellum":
Oh, we've got *all* the vellums. There's the late 90's Universal Preservation Format http://t.co/HiD7giaSko …
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
… The early 2000's Universal Virtual Computer http://t.co/j4rBxpnFVJ …
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
… The mid-2000's XCL Project (which doesn't think of itself as a universal preservation format, but it is) http://t.co/cjM31NERC8 …
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
… The late 2000's Self-contained Information Retention Format http://t.co/6tIfjpNlvC …
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
… and of course the currently available bwFLA Emulation as a Service system http://t.co/chJd5BO6Rv …
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
… and now a new one. Welcome to the party Olive Archives! Looking forward to seeing your sustainability plan… https://t.co/oTYAUacQKc
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 17, 2015
Oops, I forgot the KEEP Virtual Machine http://t.co/T3Pw8vlRU8 http://t.co/FuU93BYLBF http://t.co/3ADskRU9UE #digitalvellum
— Andy Jackson (@anjacks0n) February 18, 2015
Andy's dead right, of course. But perhaps Jason Scott has the best take on the whole thing:
Honestly, if Cerf brings the news that our digital crap is in jeopardy, that's good enough. Different people listen to him.
— Jason Scott (@textfiles) February 13, 2015
So maybe Vint didn't forget our birthday, but we didn't get a pony either. Instead we got a dime kitty.
--Michael
Comments
Post a Comment